Euro 2024 VAR review: Every decision in Germany analysed


We’re analysing every VAR decision made throughout all 51 games at Euro 2024.

After each game, we take a look at the major incidents to examine and explain the process both in terms of VAR protocol and the Laws of the Game.

Total overturns: 3
Rejected overturns: 0

Leading to goals: 1
Leading to disallowed goals: 1
Penalties awarded: 1 (0 missed)
~ for holding: 0
~ for handball: 0
Penalties cancelled: 1
Penalty retakes: 0
Rejected penalties: 0
Goals ruled out for offside: 1
Goals after incorrect offside: 0
Red cards: 1


Possible VAR overturn: Penalty for foul by Christie on Musiala

What happened: Referee Clément Turpin gave the hosts a penalty in the 25th minute for a foul by Ryan Christie on Jamal Musiala on the edge of the box. The VAR, Jérôme Brisard, came into action to check the decision.

VAR decision: Penalty cancelled.

VAR review: It’s the point of contact of the foul that determines where the offence has taken place, so an attacker can have part of their body inside the area and not win a penalty.

While there was also contact by Kieran Tierney on Musiala’s left foot, which was inside the area, the referee had awarded it for Christie’s challenge on the Germany forward’s right foot, which was outside the box.

It was quick and efficient for the VAR to tell Turpin to change his decision to a free kick. The referee didn’t have to go to the monitor for this as it was a factual decision based on position. If the VAR was questioning the foul, that would have been subjective and the referee would have to make it.

It was also the first time fans in the stadium were provided with the same information offered to broadcasters, with the reason for the VAR decision displayed on the big screen. However, unlike other competitions, UEFA has decided against a referee announcing it over the public address system.


Possible penalty and red card: Foul by Porteous on Gündogan

What happened: The game was in the 42nd minute when, after a scramble just outside the six-yard area, Ryan Porteous attempted to close down Ílkay Gündogan before he could shoot. Porteous clattered into the Germany captain, but referee Turpin waved away the penalty claims. As soon as the ball went out it became clear Gündogan required treatment, and the VAR began a check.

VAR decision: Penalty, scored by Kai Havertz, and red card for Porteous.

VAR review: Before the tournament began, referees’ chief Roberto Rosetti said he expected a zero tolerance approach to challenges of this nature, which should be judged as serious foul play.

This is one of the more extreme examples, as Porteous was off the floor with both feet and caught Gündogan above the ankle.

Any tackle where a player is sliding, diving or leaping in, and makes contact above the boot, is likely to result in a VAR review if the referee hasn’t made the correct decision to show a red card on the field.

This is something of a double-whammy for Turpin, of course, as he failed to identify the foul for the penalty, let alone the red card.


Possible offside: Füllkrug before scoring

What happened: Niclas Füllkrug added a fifth goal for Germany in the 76th minute when firing home from close range following a cross by Thomas Müller. But a VAR check was needed.

VAR decision: Offside.

VAR review: It was our first taste of semi-automated offside at Euro 2024, and it was a quick and seamless process. However, this was a clear offside involving two players stood close to each other. We are sure to see other decisions which take longer with this new offside technology, which will be introduced into the Premier League next season.

Indeed, the check on Scotland‘s consolation goal in the 87th minute, when Antonio Rüdiger diverted the ball into his own net, took much longer. The connected ball technology can tell the VAR when the ball has been played, and if another player if offside, yet it cannot detect which player has played the ball. So, when the ball was headed on, coincidentally, by Germany’s Füllkrug in a defensive position, Scotland’s Lawrence Shankland was offside but not interfering with play. So, the VAR has to check there is no offside offence against the player highlighted by the technology.



Source link